UNITED CONSTRUCTION WORKERS ET AL.

v.

LABURNUM CONSTRUCTION CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• San Diego Bldg. Trades Council v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236 (U.S. 1959)
• United Constr. Workers v. Laburnum Constr. Corp., 347 U.S. 656 (U.S. 1954)
  …out by Petitioners, does the National Labor [*659] Relations Board have exclusive jurisdiction over the subject matter so as to preclude the State Court from hearing and determining the issues in a common-law tort action based upon this conduct?’ ” 346 U. S. 936.2 We are concerned only with the above-stated jurisdictional question. We accept the view of the National Labor Relations Board that respondent’s activities affect interstate commerce within the meaning of the Labor Management Relations Act.3 The “…
• Weber v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc., 348 U.S. 468 (U.S. 1955)
  …bject matter was in the National Labor Relations Board (Garner v. Teamsters Union, 346 U. S. 485), could the Federal District Court, on application of the Board, enjoin Petitioners from enforcing an injunction already obtained from the State Court?” 346 U. S. 936. Cf., e. g., Reilly Cartage Co., 110 N. L. R. B., No. 233; Oil Workers International Union, 84 N. L. R. B. 315; International Brotherhood of Teamsters, 84 N. L. R. B. 360, rev'd sub nom. International Rice Milling Co. v. Labor Board, 183 F. 2d 21,…