WILLIAMS

v.

LINDSEY, ADMINISTRATOR

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Morton Sobell, 314 F.2d 314 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …ee United States v. Rosenberg, 108 F. Supp. 798 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d 200 F. 2d 666 (2 Cir. 1952), cert. denied 345 U.S. 965, 73 S.Ct. 949, 97 L.Ed. 1384 (1953); United States v. Sobell, unreported in the District Court and here, No. 22885, cert. denied 347 U.S. 904, 74 S.Ct. 428, 98 L. Ed. 1063 (1954) ; United States v. Sobell (two motions), 142 F.Supp. 515 (S.D.N.Y.1956), aff’d 244 F. 2d 520 (2 Cir.), cert. denied 355 U.S. 873, 78, S.Ct. 121, 2 L.Ed.2d 77 (1957). See also note 3, infra. . The Grünewald groun…
• Elisabeth Byrne v. Pa. R.R. Co., 262 F.2d 906 (3d Cir. 1958)
  …tion after instruction by the court as to the matters of fact to be considered.”5»6 Cf. Southern Pac. Co. v. Libbey, 9 Cir., 1952, 199 F. 2d 341, 343, 346; Dougall v. Spokane P. & S. Ry. Co., 9 Cir., 1953, 207 F. 2d 843, 846, certiorari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 904, 74 S.Ct. 429, 98 L.Ed. 1063. What are the applicable legal tests or standards ? In the leading case of Standard Oil Co. v. Anderson, 1909, 212 U.S. 215, 221-222, 29 S.Ct. 252, 254, 53 L.Ed. 480, the Supreme Court stated: “It sometimes happens that…
• Farmer v. Arabian Am. OIL Co., 324 F.2d 359 (2d Cir. 1963)
  …questionably true that the portion of the judgment relating to costs may be reviewed on appeal, for abuse of that discretion, if other issues are also raised. See, e. g., Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp., 207 F. 2d 67 (2 Cir. 1953), 347 U.S. 904, 74 S.Ct. 429, 98 L.Ed. 1063 (1954); Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co., 176 F. 2d 1 (7 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 948, 70 S.Ct. 486, 94 L.Ed. 584 (1950). We see no reason why we should not hear an appeal from this element alon…