BROWN

v.

JENSEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Samson Eisner (Principal) & United Bonding Ins. Co. (Surety), 323 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1963)
  …Hazel-Atlas Glass Co., 137 F. 2d 764, 770, C. A.3rd, reversed on other grounds, 322 U.S. 238, 64 S.Ct. 997, 88 L.Ed. 1250; United States v. Shaw, 115 F.Supp. 532, D.C.D.C., affirmed on other grounds, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 90, 209 F. 2d 298, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 905, 74 S.Ct. 430, 98 L.Ed. 1063. We recognize that the issuance of the mandate did not bar a petition for certiorari by the defendant to the Supreme Court. Carr v. Zaja, 283 U.S. 52, 53, 51 S.Ct. 360, 75 L.Ed. 836; The Conqueror, 166 U.S. 110, 113, 17…
• Parker v. United States, 359 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1966)
  …r its statute concerning assaults with a gun, it is no different than that intent required for simple assault. What constitutes a dangerous weapon has been before us in Medlin v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 64, 207 F. 2d 33 (1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 905, 74 S.Ct. 431, 98 L.Ed. 1064 (1954), and Tatum v. United States, 71 App.D.C. 393, 110 F. 2d 555 (1940). . The Government argued that an assault does not require an intent to injure. Some jurisdictions avoid this element by presuming an intent to in…