FARRO

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United Indus. Workers of the Seafarers Int'l Union of N. Am. v. Bd. OF Trs. OF Galveston Wharves & the City of Galveston, 400 F.2d 320 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …nternational Ass’n of Machinists, AFL-CIO v. Central Airlines, supra; Slocum v. Delaware, L. & W. R.R., 1950, 339 U.S. 239, 70 S.Ct. 577, 94 L.Ed. 795; United R.R. Operating Crafts v. Northern Pac. Ry., 9 Cir. 1953, 208 F. 2d 135, 137, cert, denied, 347 U.S. 929, 74 S.Ct. 529, 98 L.Ed. 1081. Admittedly, no case has been found where a federal court has awarded back-pay as part of its enforcement of the status quo in a major dispute. But given our role in such enforcement, and the peculiar necessity for incl…
• Alabaugh v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 222 F.2d 861 (4th Cir. 1955)
  …an able and comprehensive opinion, which was adopted by the Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit in affirming his order of dismissal. United Railroad Operating Crafts v. Wyer, D.C., 115 F.Supp. 359 affirmed 2 Cir., 205 F. 2d 153, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 929, 74 S.Ct. 529, 98 L.Ed. 1081. In the Seventh Circuit, suit was brought by an engineer who had joined the UROC and was threatened with discharge. He asked an injunction and alleged “eight to ten respects in which the discharge order, and the interpre…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Cortese, 244 F.2d 872 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …iscontinue further service of the sentence imposed.” Each added after his signature, “Signing under protest.” Their convictions (with others) were affirmed in United States v. Simone, 2 Cir., 205 F. 2d 480, certi-orari denied Farro v. United States, 347 U.S. 929, 74 S.Ct. 532, 98 L.Ed. 1082. Our mandate was filed with the District Court on July 15, 1953. Meanwhile Córtese had elected to resume service on December 17, 1951, and Farro did so on July 15, 1953. They have been credited with time served from Jan…