WILLIAMS

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Elliott v. Hendricks, 213 F.2d 922 (3d Cir. 1954)
  …ed in Pennsylvania law. The Pennsylvania rule is that of the McNaughton case [10 Clark & F. 200] and that position has been reiterated as recently as November 17, 1953, in Commonwealth v. Patskin, 375 Pa. 368, 100 A. 2d 472, certiorari denied, 1954, 347 U.S. 931, 74 S.Ct. 534. A report to defendant’s counsel by Dr. Matthew T. Moore, a matter which will be discussed later, stated that Elliott was “mentally ill” but contained no suggestion that he was insane in the McNaughton case meaning of that term. As pre…
• Geschwendt v. Ryan, 967 F.2d 877 (3d Cir. 1992)
  …y the fair weight and preponderance of the evidence, that the defendant ... was insane within the legal meaning of the term, at the time of the commission of the offense, your verdict must be not guilty by reason [*900] of insanity.”), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 931, 74 S.Ct. 534, 98 L.Ed. 1082 (1954). B. Second, the precise issue before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in Mulgrew was “whether the court below erred in failing to instruct the jury concerning the consequences of a verdict of not guilty by reason…
• COE v. Mich. Dep't OF Educ., 693 F.2d 616 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …ment is entered with respect to it, he may not maintain a second action in which he tenders the other theory or ground. § 25, Comment e. See also Partmar Corp. v. Paramount Pictures Theatres Corp., 347 U.S. 89, 74 S.Ct. 414, 98 L.Ed. 532, reh. den. 347 U.S. 931, 74 S.Ct. 527, 98 L.Ed. 1083. The Coes have taken advantage of the extensive review process granted to the parents of handicapped children protected by the EHCA. They have received several administrative hearings and have been heard in both the sta…