MEACHAM CORPORATION ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• McALLISTER v. United States, 348 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1954)
  …the disease. Judgment for damages was entered against respondent, and on appeal the Court of Appeals reversed on the ground that no proximate cause was shown between the negligence and the contraction of polio. 207 F. 2d 952. We granted certiorari. 347 U. S. 932. The first question presented is whether the Court of Appeals in reviewing the District Court’s findings applied proper standards. In reviewing a judgment of a trial court, sitting without a jury in admiralty, the Court of Appeals may not set aside…
• Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11 (U.S. 1954)
  …on of criminal justice in the federal courts,” McNabb v. United States, 318 U. S. 332, 341, and the importance of assuring alert self-restraint in the exercise by district judges of the summary power for punishing contempt, we brought the case here. 347 U. S. 932. We shall not retrace the ground so recently covered in the Sacher case, supra. In enforcing Rule 42 (a), the Court in that case emphasized its duty to safeguard two indispensable conditions to the fair administration of criminal justice: (1) couns…
• Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Est. of Sternberger, 348 U.S. 187 (U.S. 1955)
  …irmed the Tax Court, 207 F. 2d 600, on the authority of Meierhof v. Higgins, 129 F. 2d 1002. To resolve the resulting conflict with the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Newton Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 160 F. 2d 176, we granted certiorari, 347 U. S. 932. The controlling provisions of the Revenue Code are in substantially the same terms as when they were first enacted in 1919 2 and are as follows: “SEC. 812. NET ESTATE. “For the purpose of the tax the value of the net estate shall be determined .…