BAYARD ET AL.

v.

MARTIN

Citator

Cited By

• Alabaugh v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 222 F.2d 861 (4th Cir. 1955)
  …ts v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 7 Cir., 212 F. 2d 938. In the Sixth Circuit a similar suit was dismissed on the same ground in the Eastern District of Michigan by Judge Levin in Pigott v. Detroit, T. & I. R. Co., D.C., 116 F.Supp. 949, cer-tiorari denied 347 U.S. 944, 74 S.Ct. 639, 98 L.Ed. 1092. None of the grounds upon which it is sought to distinguish these cases has any merit. It is argued on the authority of our decision in Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Pope, 4 Cir., 119 F. 2d 39, that the Board has no jur…
• Pierce v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 220 F.2d 531 (1st Cir. 1955)
  …l summary judgment declaring those claims invalid. The district court in granting the defendants’ motion based its decision on the ground that this Court in American Communications Co. v. Pierce, 1 Cir., 1953, 208 F. 2d 763, certiorari denied, 1954, 347 U.S. 944, 74 S.Ct. 639, 98 L.Ed. 1092, rehearing denied 347 U.S. 970, 74 S.Ct. 775, 98 L.Ed. 1111; had adjudicated [*532] these enumerated claims void for double patenting. The plaintiff bases his appeal in effect on two grounds: (1) that this Court in Amer…
• McSHANE v. United States, 366 F.2d 286 (9th Cir. 1966)
  …54), that privilege is personal to him. He has no authority to appear as an attorney for others than himself. Russell v. United States, 308 F. 2d 78, 79 (9th Cir. 1962); Collins v. O’Brien, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 152, 208 F. 2d 44, 45 (1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 944, 74 S.Ct. 640, 98 L.Ed. 1092 (1954). [*289] The District Court, on its own motion, dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. This was proper. Inasmuch as the suit was against the United States, it was incumbent upon the appellant to bring hi…