FONTANO

v.

NEW JERSEY

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. RICO, 902 F.2d 1065 (2d Cir. 1990)
  …al sentences or sentences imposed in an illegal manner. See United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 133-34, 101 S.Ct. 426, 435-36, 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980); United States v. Bradford, 194 F. 2d 197, 200-01 (2d Cir.1952) (L. Hand, J.), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 945, 74 S.Ct. 642, 98 L.Ed. 1093 (1954); Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 (1982); id. advisory committee’s note (Rule 35 “continues existing law”). While continuing the district court’s inherent power to correct illegal sentences at any time, former Rule 35 was enact…
• United States v. McGANN, 245 F.2d 670 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …the sole purpose was to minimize the difficulties encountered in habeas corpus hearings by affording the same rights in another and more convenient forum.” “Thus,” we held in United States v. Bradford, 2 Cir., 194 F. 2d 197, 200, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 945, 74 S.Ct. 642, 98 L.Ed. 1093, “the section should be read as coextensive in substance with the writ, and as confined to amending the procedure.” In McNally v. Hill, 293 U.S. 131, 55 S.Ct. 24, 79 L.Ed. 238, the Supreme Court settled beyond cavil that…
• Bradford v. Emmet E. Harding, 284 F.2d 307 (2d Cir. 1960)