ALABAMA
v.
TEXAS ET AL.; AND RHODE ISLAND V. LOUISIANA ET AL.

U.S. | 1954-04-26
The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
347 U.S. 950 Supreme Court of the United States (1954) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wilburn Boat Co. v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co., 348 U.S. 310 (U.S. 1955)
    …“It is the settled doctrine that a marine contract of insurance is 'derived from’ is 'governed by’, and is a ‘part of’ the general maritime law of the world.” 201 F. 2d 833, 837. Importance of the questions involved prompted us to grant certiorari. 347 U. S. 950.6 Since the insurance policy here sued on is a maritime contract the Admiralty Clause of the Constitution brings it within federal jurisdiction. Insurance Co. v. Dunham, 11 Wall. 1. But it does not follow, as the courts below seemed to think, that…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw