UNITED STATES

v.

BROWN

Citator

Cited By (17 total)

• United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110 (U.S. 1954)
  …he contention of petitioner that respondent’s sole relief was under the Veterans Act and dismissed his complaint under the Tort Claims Act. The Court of Appeals reversed. 209 F. 2d 463. The case is here on a petition for certiorari which we granted, 347 U. S. 951, because of doubts as to whether Brooks v. United States, 337 U. S. 49, or Feres v. United States, 340 U. S. 135, controlled this case. The Brooks case held that servicemen were covered by the Tort Claims Act where the injury was not incident to or…
• Nat'l City Bank of N.Y. v. Republic OF China, 348 U.S. 356 (U.S. 1955)
  …setoffs) and, therefore, it would be an invasion of respondent’s sovereign immunity for our courts to permit them to be pursued. 208 F. 2d 627. Because of the importance of the question and its first appearance in this Court, we granted certiorari.2 347 U. S. 951. The status of the Republic of China in our courts is a matter for determination by the Executive and is outside the competence of this Court. Accordingly, we start with the fact that the Republic and its governmental agencies enjoy a foreign sover…
• Nat'l Automatic Laundry & Cleaning Council v. Shultz, 443 F.2d 689 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …t contrary to an administrative ruling. See, e. g., Van Dyke v. Bluefield Gas Co., 210 F. 2d 620 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 347 U.S. 1014, 74 S.Ct. 870, 98 L.Ed. 1137 (1954); General Electric Co. v. Porter, 208 F. 2d 805 (9th Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 951, 74 S.Ct. 676, 98 L.Ed. 1097 (1954). But where the advice of counsel is given in the face of an administrative questioning of the situation it has been held not to be sufficient in and of itself to establish “reasonable grounds” for believing there…