UNITED STATES

v.

HOOLEY

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Usery v. Marquette Cement Mfg. Co., 568 F.2d 902 (2d Cir. 1977)
  …ted whether “the evidence went to the unpleaded issue”, Niedland, supra, 338 F. 2d at 258, or that the Secretary’s “failure or mistake [may have misled] the party charged”, NLRB v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 209 F. 2d 393, 401 (2 Cir. 1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 953 (1954), or that there was even a slight chance of “misunderstanding as to what was the basis of the [Secretary’s] complaint”, NLRB v. Mackay Co., 304 U.S. 333, 350 (1938). Accordingly in fairness we hold that there was no implied consent. . As stat…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wooster Div. OF Borg-Warner Corp., 236 F.2d 898 (6th Cir. 1956)
  …v. Deena Artware, supra, 6 Cir., 198 F. 2d 645; N. L. R. B. v. Thayer Co., 1 Cir., 213 F. 2d 748, 752, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 883, 75 S.Ct. 123, 99 L. Ed. 694; N. L. R. B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F. 2d 393, 404-405, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 953, 74 S.Ct. 678, 98 L.Ed. 1099. The Board found that the record did not establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the strike was caused by the Company’s refusal to bargain rather than by a failure to reach agreement on the economic issues in d…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stanislaus Implement & Hardware Co., Ltd., 226 F.2d 377 (9th Cir. 1955)
  …952, 200 F. 2d 620, 624; or appear at the scheduled meetings in November during the strike, see N.L.R.B. v. Biles Coleman Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 1938, 98 F. 2d 18, 22; N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 1953, 209 F. 2d 393, 403; certiorari denied 347 U.S. 953, 74 S.Ct. 678, 98 L.Ed. 1099, and finally Baxter’s statement characterizing the purpose of the Company, are all facts shedding light on the Company’s intent and support the inference drawn by the Board that Respondent did not bargain in good faith.…