GRAYSON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Hattaway v. United States, 399 F.2d 431 (5th Cir. 1968)
  ….S. 299, 52 S.Ct. 180, 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932) ; Gore v. United States, 357 U.S. 386, 78 S.Ct. 1280, 2 L.Ed.2d 1405 (1958); Bins v. United States, 331 F. 2d 390 (5 Cir. [*433] 1964); and Crabtree v. United States, 209 F. 2d 164 (5 Cir. 1953), cert. den. 347 U.S. 961, 74 S.Ct. 710, 98 L.Ed. 1104. See also, Burton v. United States, 202 U.S. 344, 26 S.Ct. 688, 50 L.Ed. 1057 (1906) and Morgan v. Devine, 237 U.S. 632, 35 S.Ct. 712, 59 L.Ed. 1153 (1915). Here, the Mann Act charge is a separate and distinct offense f…
• United States v. Black, 412 F.2d 687 (6th Cir. 1969)
  …of the District Judge, he immediately ordered an exclusion of the witnesses. This was a matter within his discretion. We find no abuse of discretion or prejudice to the defendant. Powell v. United States, 208 F. 2d 618 (6th Cir.1953), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 961, 74 S.Ct. 710, 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954). During cross-examination of the bank employees the defense moved for production of their statements made to FBI agents. The Court conducted a hearing in the absence of the jury. The bank employees were questione…
• United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …ses does not constitute error unless there is a clear abuse of discretion. United States v. Eley, 7 Cir., 314 F. 2d 127 (1963); United States v. Cephas, 7 Cir., 263 F. 2d 518 (1959); Powell v. United States, 6 Cir., 208 F. 2d 618 (1953), cert. den., 347 U.S. 961, 74 S.Ct. 710, 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954), reh. den., 347 U.S. 979, 74 S.Ct. 789, 98 L.Ed. 1118 (1946). Contrary to appellant’s argument, the trial court exercised its discretion by determining to follow the rule excepting an investigative officer from th…