LIPSCOMB

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• In re O'Neill, 9 Fla. Supp. 153 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1956)
  …uced in this case it was improper for the Judge of the Court of General Sessions to grant the subpoena-order without any proof of the materiality of the testimony of the Order. In State v. Blount (Ore. 1954), 264 P. 2d 419, cert. den. 74 S. Ct. 711, 347 U.S. 962, 98 L. Ed. 1105, the Oregon court held that the showing of the facts required by the “uniform law” to show that the witness is “material and necessary,” should at least be as great as the showing required in order to obtain a continuance upon the gr…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Bush v. United States, 267 F.2d 483 (9th Cir. 1959)
  …90 F. 2d 496. It is not necessary that such intent be the sole and single purpose of the transportation, if such purpose and intent was one of the reasons for the transportation. Masse v. United States, 5 Cir., 1954, 210 F. 2d 418, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 962, 74 S.Ct. 711, 98 L.Ed. 1105. It was defendant’s position that he was the innocent victim of the complaining witness, that he had merely aided her to come to California from Texas to visit friends. According to defendant’s trial counsel, “the girl…
• United States v. Hawthorne, 356 F.2d 740 (4th Cir. 1966)
  …Dulles, 357 U.S. 116, 78 S.Ct. 1113, 2 L.Ed.2d 1204 (1958); Zemel v. Rusk, 381 U.S. 1, 85 S.Ct. 1271, 14 L.Ed.2d 179 (1965). The government cites no case which supports its position. Masse v. United States, 210 F. 2d 418 (5 Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 962, 74 S.Ct. 711, 98 L.Ed. 1105, a Mann Act case, is not in point. While there it is true the court found that Masse was guilty even though his immoral conduct was not the sole purpose of Ms trip (he also travelled to get a divorce) the substantive off…