JOHNS
v.
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
JOHNS
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
347 U.S. 964
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The judgment of the three-judge court is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Complaint and Suit of Samuel Cunningham v. Erie R.R. Co. & United R.R. Workers of Am., Inc., 266 F.2d 411 (2d Cir. 1959)…v. Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., 1950, 339 U.S. 239, 70 S.Ct. 577, 94 L.Ed. 795; Order of Railway Conductors v. Pitney, 1946, 326 U.S. 561, 66 S.Ct. 322, 90 L.Ed. 318; Johns v. Baltimore & O. R. R., N.D.Ill., 1954, 118 F.Supp. 317, affirmed per curiam, 347 U.S. 964, 74 S.Ct. 776, 98 L.Ed. 1107; and Hayes v. Union Pacific R. R., 9 Cir., 1950, 184 F. 2d 337, certiorari denied 340 U.S. 942, 71 S.Ct. 506, 95 L.Ed. 680, which incidentally was stated by the Supreme Court in Conley v. Gibson, 1957, 355 U.S. 41, 44, n…
-
Alabaugh v. The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 222 F.2d 861 (4th Cir. 1955)…court by Judge Lind ley which answers practically every argument made before us. Upon appeal the action of the three judge court was affirmed in a per curiam order by the Supreme Court. Johns v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., D.C., 118 F.Supp. 317, affirmed 347 U.S. 964, 74 S.Ct. 776, 98 L.Ed. 1107. Judge La Buy, one of the members of the panel of three judges, [*866] dismissed the case when it was returned to him upon the dissolution of the three judge court. Similar injunction suits by. engineers who had joined U…1 / 2
-
Beecher v. Smithson, 217 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1954)…d., 344 U.S. 886, 73 S.Ct. 187, 97 L.Ed. 686; Beecher v. Smithson, 9 Cir., 205 F. 2d 113; Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank, 9 Cir., 209 F. 2d 20; Id., 9 Cir., 211 F. 2d 158, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 949, 74 S.Ct. 649, 98 L.Ed. -, rehearing denied 347 U.S. 964, 74 S. Ct. 712, 98 L.Ed.-.…