KANN ET AL.

v.

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• United States v. James, 478 U.S. 597 (U.S. 1986)
  …8] 7028 (remarks of Rep. Spearing); id., at 6999-7000 (remarks of Rep. Frear).9 These statements show that the sweeping language of § 702c was no drafting inadvertence. See National Mfg. Co. v. United States, 210 F. 2d 263, 270 (CA8), cert. denied, 347 U. S. 967 (1954). Congress clearly sought to ensure beyond doubt that sovereign immunity would protect the Government from “any” liability associated with flood control. As the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit explained three decades ago in National Mf…
• Ingham v. E. AIR Lines, Inc., 373 F.2d 227 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …2d 614 (1961). Moreover, we agree that a misrepresentation may result from the failure to provide information, as well as from providing information that is wrong. See National Mfg. Co. v. United States, 210 F. 2d 263, 276 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 967, 74 S.Ct. 778, 98 L.Ed. 1108 (1954). Nevertheless, the government’s reading of the misrepresentation exception is much too broad, for it would exempt from tort liability any operational malfunction by the government that involved communications in…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fla. Med. Ctr., Inc., 576 F.2d 666 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …rest periods, this time is considered non-working time during which an employer may not impose a nonsolicitation rule. N. L. R. B. v. Mueller Brass, 501 F. 2d 680 (5 Cir. 1974); N. L. R. B. v. Monarch Tool Co., 210 F. 2d 183 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 967, 74 S.Ct. 778, 98 L.Ed. 1109 (1954). . The hospital also argued that a special circumstances exception to the general prohibition against broad no solicitation rules was warranted in its case. We recognize that the intermingling of patients and emp…