TURNER ET AL.
v.
CALIFORNIA

U.S. | 1954-05-24
No. 655
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Reed are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted.
347 U.S. 972 Supreme Court of the United States (1954) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Reed are of the opinion probable jurisdiction should be noted.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …school attendance of “each minor from seven to sixteen years of age” unless he has completed high school. Id., § 3205. E. g., People v. Turner, 121 Cal. App. 2d 861, 263 P. 2d 685 (1953), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 347 U. S. 972 (1954). In 1965-1966 in New York State, over 900,000 students, or 22.2% of total state enrollment, attended nonpublic schools. University of State of New York, Education Statistics Estimates 1966-67, Table I (1966). The comparable statistic for the…
  • …412 So. 2d [*951] 1242; Burrow v. State, 282 Ark. 479, 669 S.W. 2d 441 (1984) (upholding ban on home schooling); People v. Turner, 121 Cal.App.2d Supp. 861, 263 P. 2d 685 (1953) (similar), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 347 U.S. 972, 74 S.Ct. 785, 98 L.Ed. 1112 (1954); Blount, 551 A. 2d 1377; Care and Protection of Charles, 399 Mass. 324, 504 N.E. 2d 592; Patzer, 382 N.W. 2d 631; State v. Schmidt, 29 Ohio St.3d 32, 505 N.E. 2d 627, cert. denied, 484 U.S. 942, 108 S.Ct. 327, 98…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw