HINDERHAN
v.
RANDOLPH, WARDEN
HINDERHAN
RANDOLPH, WARDEN
347 U.S. 977
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Moore v. United States, 461 F.2d 1236 (D.C. Cir. 1972)…idavit is not necessarily either part of the warrant or available for defining the scope of the warrant. United States v. Kaye, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 214, 432 F. 2d 647 (1970); Ledbetter v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 155, 211 F. 2d 628, cert. denied, 347 U.S. 977, 74 S.Ct. 789, 98 L.Ed. 1116 (1954). However, the warrant may properly be construed with reference to an affidavit for purposes of sustaining the particularity of the premises to be searched, provided (1) the affidavit accompanies the warrant, and…
-
Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United States, 355 F.2d 636 (Ct. Cl. 1966)…iraglia v. United States, 141 Ct.Cl. 664 (1958); Bornhoft v. United States, 137 Ct.Cl. 134 (1956); Leverette v. United States, 142 F.Supp. 955, 135 Ct.Cl. 207 (1956); Burkholder v. United States, 119 F.Supp. 743, 128 Ct.Cl. 767 (1954), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 977, 74 S.Ct. 789, 98 L.Ed. 1116 (1954). Plaintiff has attempted to interject a contract theory into the case by alleging that under the mortgage agreements the Government impliedly agreed to do nothing to hinder performance of plaintiff’s obligations.…