SCHILACI
v.
ILLINOIS
SCHILACI
ILLINOIS
347 U.S. 979
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Garafolo, 385 F.2d 200 (7th Cir. 1967)…f discretion. United States v. Eley, 7 Cir., 314 F. 2d 127 (1963); United States v. Cephas, 7 Cir., 263 F. 2d 518 (1959); Powell v. United States, 6 Cir., 208 F. 2d 618 (1953), cert. den., 347 U.S. 961, 74 S.Ct. 710, 98 L.Ed. 1104 (1954), reh. den., 347 U.S. 979, 74 S.Ct. 789, 98 L.Ed. 1118 (1946). Contrary to appellant’s argument, the trial court exercised its discretion by determining to follow the rule excepting an investigative officer from the order excluding witnesses. There is no substance to this co…
-
Schoppel v. United States, 270 F.2d 413 (4th Cir. 1959)…he various exhibits in proper order. The Sixth Circuit had a case almost identical in this regard in Powell v. United States, 6 Cir., 1953, 208 F. 2d 618, 619, certiorari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 961, 74 S.Ct. 710, 98 L.Ed. 1104, rehearing denied 1954, 347 U.S. 979, 74 S.Ct. 789, 98 L.Ed. 1118, certiorari denied 1955, 348 U.S. 939, 75 S.Ct. 357, 99 L.Ed. 736. The court said: “Appellant contends that the District Court committed reversible er [*417] ror in allowing one of the government witnesses to be present…