OPPER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 (U.S. 1954)
  …ance was denied. The jury found petitioner guilty on all counts and sentence was duly imposed. On appeal the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed the conviction as to the above counts now before us. 211 F. 2d 719. Certiorari was granted, 347 U. S. 1010, because of asserted variance or conflict between the legal conclusion reached in this case — that an extrajudicial, exculpatory statement of an accused, subsequent to the alleged crime, needs no corroboration — and other cases to the contrary.2 Thi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 (U.S. 1954)
  …y found petitioner guilty on the first four counts, and the conviction was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. 210 F. 2d 496. We granted certiorari in order to pass on the issues raised by the prosecution’s use of defendant’s extrajudicial statements. 347 U. S. 1010. The Government’s theory was that the increases in the net worth of petitioner and his wife exceeded their reported income for each of the prosecution years, and that these increments represented taxable income. The evidence tended to show that pet…
• Ass'n of Westinghouse Salaried Emps. v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 348 U.S. 437 (U.S. 1955)
  …e respondent liable, since the cause of the absences from work was not alleged. 210 F. 2d, at 630. The case was brought here for construction of a section of the Taft-Hartley Act which has proved a fertile source of difficulty for the lower courts. 347 U. S. 1010. 1. In dealing with an enactment such as § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act,1 it is necessary first [*442] to ascertain its jurisdictional scope, more particularly, whether it extends to the suit at hand. Here, as may not infrequently be t…