CALIFORNIA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (34 total)

• Int'l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 490 F.2d 1334 (2d Cir. 1974)
  …nd thus relinquished nothing in the exchange. Accordingly, that self-dealing transaction does not appear to satisfy the “purchase or sale” requirement of § 10(b) and Rule 10(b)-5. Cf. Blau v. Mission Corp., 212. F. 2d 77, 80 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 347 U.S. 1016, 74 S.Ct. 872, 98 L.Ed. 1138 (1954); 8 In re Penn Central Securities Litigation, 347 F.Supp. 1327, 1333-1339 (E.D.Pa.1972). ICC also suggests that its dividend in kind of the Fairfield General stock represented a “sale” under the relevant statute a…
• Ferraiolo v. Newman, 259 F.2d 342 (6th Cir. 1958)
  …93 L.Ed. 1719; Truncale v. Blumberg, D.C., 80 F.Supp. 387; Blau v. Hodgkinson, D.C.1951, 100 F.Supp. 361; Blau v. Ogsbury, 2 Cir., 1954, 210 F. 2d 426; Blau v. Mission Corporation, D.C., 113 F.Supp. 153; 2 Cir., 212 F. 2d 77, certiorari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 1016, 74 S.Ct. 872, 98 L.Ed. 1138; Roberts v. Eaton, 2 Cir., 212 F. 2d 82, certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 827, 75 S.Ct. 44, 99 L.Ed. 652 The standard that emerges from these decisions can be simply stated; Every transaction which can reasonably be def…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• L. G. Balfour Co. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 442 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1971)
  …dequate if “the one proceeded against be reasonably apprised of the issues in controversy, and any such notice is adequate in the absence of a showing that a party was misled.” Cella v. United States, 208 F. 2d 783, 789 (7th Cir. 1953), cert. denied 347 U.S. 1016, 74 S. Ct. 864, 98 L.Ed. 1138 (1954); Swift & Co. v. United States, 393 F. 2d 247, 252 (7th Cir. 1968). As the Commission case against petitioners unfolded, there was a “reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party and to meet the…