MCGRAW ELECTRIC CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1954-10-14
No. 177
348 U.S. 804 Supreme Court of the United States (1954) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Fla. Processing Co., 229 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1969)
    …understanding of a cause is not particularly important so long as a competent understanding exists. See Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 56 S.Ct. 906, 80 L.Ed. 1288 (1936); McGraw Electric Co. v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 354 (E.D.Mo.) aff’d 348 U.S. 804, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 635 (1954); 2 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 11.02 (1958); Cooper, Administrative Agencies and the Courts, 215-220 (1951); Annotations, 18 A.L.R.2d 606-629. Accordingly the question here is whether or not Gibson and Re…
  • Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. Otis, 348 F.2d 798 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
    …Commission, 67 App.D.C. 316, 92 F. 2d 467, cert. denied, 302 U.S. 735, 58 S.Ct. 120, 82 L.Ed. 568 (1937); United States ex rel. Minuto v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 83 F. 2d 166 (1936); McGraw Electric Co. v. United States, E.D. Mo., 320 F.Supp. 354, affirmed, 348 U.S. 804, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 635 (1954). . Southeastern Area Local Service Investigation, 10 Pike & Fischer Admin. Law 2d 353 (C.A.B. 1960); Triad Television Corp. et al., 27 F.C.C. 96, 9 Pike & Fischer Admin. Law 2d 617 (1959); Power Authority of the St…
  • …whatever special treatment was accorded Explorer’s owners was required by the need to meet competition from Explorer and other carriers. See, e. g., McGraw Elec. Co. v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 354, 361-62 (E.D.Mo.) (three-judge court), affd mem., 348 U.S. 804, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 635 (1954); JA at 1888, 2574.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw