MCGRAW ELECTRIC CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
MCGRAW ELECTRIC CO. ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
348 U.S. 804
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.
Per Curiam:
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Fla. Processing Co., 229 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1969)…understanding of a cause is not particularly important so long as a competent understanding exists. See Morgan v. United States, 298 U.S. 468, 56 S.Ct. 906, 80 L.Ed. 1288 (1936); McGraw Electric Co. v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 354 (E.D.Mo.) aff’d 348 U.S. 804, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 635 (1954); 2 Davis, Administrative Law Treatise, § 11.02 (1958); Cooper, Administrative Agencies and the Courts, 215-220 (1951); Annotations, 18 A.L.R.2d 606-629. Accordingly the question here is whether or not Gibson and Re…
-
Gearhart & Otis, Inc. v. Otis, 348 F.2d 798 (D.C. Cir. 1965)…Commission, 67 App.D.C. 316, 92 F. 2d 467, cert. denied, 302 U.S. 735, 58 S.Ct. 120, 82 L.Ed. 568 (1937); United States ex rel. Minuto v. Reimer, 2 Cir., 83 F. 2d 166 (1936); McGraw Electric Co. v. United States, E.D. Mo., 320 F.Supp. 354, affirmed, 348 U.S. 804, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 635 (1954). . Southeastern Area Local Service Investigation, 10 Pike & Fischer Admin. Law 2d 353 (C.A.B. 1960); Triad Television Corp. et al., 27 F.C.C. 96, 9 Pike & Fischer Admin. Law 2d 617 (1959); Power Authority of the St…
-
Farmers Union Cent. Exch. v. Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n & the United States, 584 F.2d 408 (D.C. Cir. 1978)…whatever special treatment was accorded Explorer’s owners was required by the need to meet competition from Explorer and other carriers. See, e. g., McGraw Elec. Co. v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 354, 361-62 (E.D.Mo.) (three-judge court), affd mem., 348 U.S. 804, 75 S.Ct. 45, 99 L.Ed. 635 (1954); JA at 1888, 2574.…