HARSH
v.
ILLINOIS TERMINAL RAILROAD CO.
HARSH
ILLINOIS TERMINAL RAILROAD CO.
348 U.S. 809
Supreme Court of the United States (1954)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States ex rel. Toth v. Quarles, 350 U.S. 11 (U.S. 1955)…Act, rejecting the contention that civilian ex-servicemen like Toth could not constitutionally be subjected to trial by court-martial. 94 U. S. App. D. C. 28, 215 F. 2d 22. We granted cer-tiorari to pass upon this important constitutional question. 348 U. S. 809.3 The 1950 Act cannot be sustained on the constitutional power of Congress “To raise and support Armies,” “To declare War,” or to punish “Offences against the Law of [*14] Nations.” 4 And this assertion of military authority over civilians cannot r…
-
Whitehouse v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 349 U.S. 366 (U.S. 1955)…the nature of mandamus” to compel the Board to perform its duty, the Court of Appeals affirmed, one judge dissenting. 212 F. 2d 22. We granted certiorari because serious questions concerning the administration of the Railway Labor Act are in issue. 348 U. S. 809. We have been urged to resolve the present dispute regarding the requirement of notice to persons not formal parties to a submission to the Board, a dispute which has resulted in numerous conflicting decisions by the Board.2 This remains a perplexi…
-
Harsh v. Ill. Terminal R.R. Co., 348 U.S. 940 (U.S. 1955)…[*940] Certiorari, 348 U. S. 809, to the Supreme Court of Illinois. Per Curiam: Judgment reversed. Lavender v. Kurn, 327 U. S. 645.…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence