UNITED STATES ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA EASTERN LINE, INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Indian Towing Co., Inc. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1955)
  …nd the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed per curiam. 211 F. 2d 886. Because the case presented an important aspect of the still undetermined extent of the Government’s liability under the Federal Tort Claims Act, we granted certiorari, 348 U. S. 810. The judgment of the Court of Appeals was affirmed by an equally divided Court, 349 U. S. 902, but a petition for rehearing was granted, the earlier judgment in this Court vacated, and the case restored to the docket for reargument before the full B…
• Lawlor v. Nat'l Screen Serv. Corp., 349 U.S. 322 (U.S. 1955)
  …ng plaintiff’s customers, agree beforehand to purchase or lease for the exploitation of all of their films exhibited, standard accessories and advertising materials directly from the defendant NATIONAL.” 99 F. Supp. 180,188. Ibid. 211 F. 2d 934. 348 U. S. 810. E. g., Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351, 352-353; United States v. Moser, 266 U. S. 236, 241. See also Restatement, Judgments, §§ 47, 48, 68. The term res judicata is used broadly in the Restatement to cover merger, bar, collateral estoppel…
• Lewis v. United States, 348 U.S. 419 (U.S. 1955)
  …[*420] a motion to dismiss the information. The Municipal Court of Appeals for the District reversed, 100 A. 2d 40, and the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Municipal Court of Appeals. 94 U. S. App. D. C.-, 214 F. 2d 853. We granted certiorari. 348 U. S. 810. The questions presented in this case are: Does the Act, as applied to the petitioner in the District of Columbia, constitute a valid exercise of the taxing power or is it a penalty under the guise of a tax? Secondly, does it violate the Fifth Amen…