OSBORNE

v.

OWSLEY, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Shotwell Mfg. Co. v. United States, 371 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1963)
  …one in the absence of Mr. Sullivan, would not be binding or competent as to Mr. Sullivan.” This limiting instruction is clear. It must be presumed that the jury conscientiously observed it. United States v. Harris, 211 F. 2d 656, 659, cert. denied, 348 U. S. 822, Surely it would have been impracticable for the trial judge, as he discussed the evidence in his final instructions, to have reminded the jury with respect to each of the many items of proof mentioned that it had been admitted only against certain…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lion OIL Co., 352 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1957)
  …n Service and to the Arkansas Labor Commissioner to comply with § 8 (d) (2). The only other case in the Courts of Appeals involving the question presented here is Local No. 3, United Packinghouse Workers v. Labor Board, 210 F. 2d 325, cert. denied, 348 U. S. 822, also decided by the Eighth Circuit. The court there construed § 8 (d) (4) as it did here, although on its facts the decision is reconcilable with the Board’s construction of the section in this case. Joint Committee on Labor-Management Relations,…
• United States v. Park, 531 F.2d 754 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …508 F. 2d 58; United States v. Armocida, 3 Cir. 1975, 515 F. 2d 29. . The government, as well as some courts, e. g., Williams v. United States, 9 Cir. 1959, 265 F. 2d 214, 215; United States v. Harris, 7 Cir. 1954, 211 F. 2d 656, 659, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 822, 75 S.Ct. 34, 99 L.Ed. 648; Turner v. United States, 4 Cir. 1955, 222 F. 2d 926, 932, confuses the consolidation of charges under Rules 13 and 8(a) with the granting or denying of a severance of properly joined charges under Rule 14, see Tillman v.…