AGHNIDES

v.

GOODRIE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
  …owan, 344 U.S. 918. Terminal Railroad Assn. of St. Louis v. Barnett, 345 U. S. 956. Southern Pacific Co. v. Miller, 346 U. S. 909. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R. Co. v. Woodrow, 347 U. S. 935. [*24] Fort Worth & Denver R. Co. v. Prine, 348 U. S. 826. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. Bonnier,-348 U. S. 830. Chicago North Western R. Co. v. Margevich, 348 U. S. 861. Louisiana & Arkansas R. Co. v. Johnson, 348 U. S. 875. Chattanooga Station Co. v. Massey, 348 U. S. 896. Chicago, Rock Isla…
• Loyd Carl RAY v. United States, 367 F.2d 258 (8th Cir. 1966)
  …212, 1 L.Ed.2d 124 (1956), the court said that “One cannot speculate upon failure to call a witness and thereafter present such testimony as newly discovered,” at 332. See also: United States v. Marachowsky, 213 F. 2d 235 (7 Cir. 1954), cert. denied 348 U.S. 826, 75 S.Ct. 43, 99 L.Ed. 651; Blodgett v. United States, 161 F. 2d 47 (8 Cir. 1947); Apel v. United States, 247 F. 2d 277 (8 Cir. 1957). This court cannot but observe appellant wears shoes similar to a party seeking a new trial on newly discovered ev…
• Comer Blocker v. United States, 274 F.2d 572 (D.C. Cir. 1959)
  …ch caused him to kill his wife, whether or not such a disturbance is a “mental disease." That being true, he did not make a showing which entitled him to a new trial. United States v. Marachowsky, 213 F. 2d 235, 238 (7 Cir., 1954), certiorari denied 348 U.S. 826, 75 S.Ct. 43, 99 L.Ed. 651; United States v. Johnson, 142 F. 2d 588 (7 Cir., 1944); Papineau v. Idaho First Nat’l Bank, 74 Idaho 145, 258 P. 2d 755, 758 (1953); In re Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co., 23 Del.Ch. 215, 2 A. 2d 273, 278 (1938); Huey v. We…