STANDARD GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

v.

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Matter of the United Corp. Joseph B. Hyman, 249 F.2d 168 (3d Cir. 1957)
  …s counsel in a reorganization proceeding preclude any strict standards equally applicable to both. The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit in Standard Gas & Electric Co. v. S.E.C., 212 F. 2d 407, certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 831, 75 S. Ct. 52, 99 L.Ed. 655, enunciates the standards for determining compensation for company counsel. It was there stated (212 F. 2d at page 412) : “At the outset it should be noted that counsel for the company in reorganization stands in a somew…
• Schroeder v. Oveta Culp Hobby, 222 F.2d 713 (10th Cir. 1955)
  …this kind is to extend mother’s benefits to a former wife divorced whose economic relationship to the insured wage earner was such that she sustained economic loss arising out of his death. Baetich v. Hobby, 2 Cir., 212 F. 2d 480, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 831, 75 S.Ct. 54; Stephens v. Federal Security Administrator, D.C., 121 F. Supp. 120. The appellant owned the residential property and the furnishings therein at the time of the death of the insured wage earner. She was renting two rooms in the residenc…
• Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Dumaine, 218 F.2d 308 (1st Cir. 1954)
  …. of New Jersey, 3 Cir., 1954, 211 F. 2d 231, 234, 235, certiorari denied sub nom. United Corp. v. S. E. C., 1954, 348 U.S. 820, 75 S.Ct. 32; and Standard Gas & Electric Co. v. S. E. C., 8 Cir., 1954, 212 F. 2d 407, 410, 411, certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 831, 75 S.Ct. 52, and the cases cited therein. We think that the Commission’s decision as to Koppers was clearly within the scope of its discretion in carrying out the congressional policy underlying the Act, and in support of that view we have nothing…