THEARD

v.

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Griffith v. State, 654 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)
  …is a nullity, and the effect of the reversal is to restore the defendant to the point in the proceedings where the error was made. Ex Parte Livingston, 116 Fla. 640, 156 So. 612 (1934); and Kaminski v. State, 72 So. 2d 400 (Fla.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 832, 75 S.Ct. 55, 99 L.Ed. 656 (1954). Hence the convictions being reversed — namely the charges in counts I, II, IV, VI and VII of the Information — are void, and the state must begin anew as regards them. Because appellant did not raise any issue on a…
• S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Roper, 438 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …atingly prejudicial to the defendant Southern Bell in this case. We have no alternative, under the established law, but to reverse and remand for a new trial based on this prejudicial error. Kaminski v. State, 63 So. 2d 339 (Fla.1953), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 832, 75 S.Ct. 55, 99 L.Ed. 656 (1954); Food Fair, Inc. v. Anderson, 382 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980); Crawford v. State, 321 So. 2d 559 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); see Farmer v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 427 So. 2d 187 (Fla.1983). The final judgment under re…
• KEY v. State, 430 So. 2d 909 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …eptance rule in determining admissibility of testimony based upon scientific evidence, while holding that the trial judge has wide discretion concerning admissibility of evidence. See, e.g., Kaminski v. State, 63 So. 2d 339 (Fla.1953), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 832, 75 S.Ct. 55, 99 L.Ed. 656 (1954) (lie dector evidence — disallowed); Coppolino v. State,- 223 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968), dismissed, 234 So. 2d 120 (Fla.1969), cert. denied, 399 U.S. 927, 90 S.Ct. 2242, 26 L.Ed.2d 794 (1970) (toxicology tests — a…