RUMSA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Breen v. Beto, 341 F.2d 96 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …by proof the prior conviction before the jury before a determination of guilt of Appellant on the primary offense?’ “This question has been before this Court in the following cases: Redding v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 535, 265 S.W. 2d 811, cert, denied 348 U.S. 838, 75 S.Ct. 38, 99 L.Ed. 661; Finley v. State, 161 [*98] Tex.Cr.R. 458, 278 S.W. 2d 864; Dozier v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 84, 318 S.W. 2d 80, cert, denied, 361 U.S. 849, 80 S.Ct. 107, 4 L.Ed.2d 88; Welch v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 425, 341 S.W. 2d 909; Ex…
• United States v. Bayard Edward Ryan, 320 F.2d 500 (6th Cir. 1963)
  …ainst oppressive procedures. Goldberg v. Truck Drivers Local Union No. 299, 293 F. 2d 807, 814 (C.A.6), cert. denied 368 U.S. 938, 82 S.Ct. 379, 7 L.Ed.2d 337. In Peoples Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 212 F. 2d 86 (C.A.6), cert. denied 348 U.S. 838, 75 S.Ct. 37, 99 L.Ed. 661 we accepted the testimony of a special agent who had a strong suspicion that a false and fraudulent return was made by the taxpayer. We held that the agent was not required to disclose in detail the facts relative to his i…
• Application of the United States, 246 F.2d 762 (2d Cir. 1957)
  …ial nature to reveal those dealings £S. J) In another case in which the investigation was said to be “unnecessary” because of the statute of limitations, Peoples Deposit Bank & Trust Co. v. United States, 6 Cir., 212 F. 2d 86, 87, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 838, 75 S.Ct. 37, 99 L.Ed. 661, “a special agent of the Bureau of Internal Revenue testified in substance, that from his investigation he-had concluded that there was strong suspicion of a false or fraudulent tax return by E. F. Prichard, Sr., for a cer…