WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

v.

LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA, INC. ET AL.; AND LEE OPTICAL OF OKLAHOMA, INC. ET AL. V. WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Williams v. Georgia, 349 U.S. 375 (U.S. 1955)
  …ollows that, for this reason, the motion for new trial was not sufficient as an extraordinary motion for new trial.” 210 Ga. 665, 668, 82 S. E. 2d 217, 219. In view of the entanglement of this case with our decision in Avery, we granted certiorari. 348 U. S. 854. Since the attorney appointed by the Georgia court advised the Clerk of this Court that he would not be in a position to present oral argument before this Court,4 we appointed [*381] amicus curiae to present argument on Williams’ behalf. 348 U. S. 9…
• Courtney v. Schroeder, 348 U.S. 933 (U.S. 1955)
  …Certiorari, 348 U. S. 854, to the Supreme Court of Kansas. Per Curiam: The judgment is reversed and the case is remanded for proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion of this Court in In re Oliver, 333 U. S. 257.…
• Murray Ferguson Under Chapter X Proceeding for Equitable Plan Co. v. Bucks Cnty. Farms, Inc., 280 F.2d 739 (3d Cir. 1960)
  …the late Judge Frank dissenting, agreed with the views expressed by Judge Major, and held Rule 65(c) not to be applicable in a plenary action by a bankruptcy trustee, in Halpert v. Engine Air Service, 2 Cir., 1954, 212 F. 2d 860, certiorari granted, 348 U.S. 854, 75 S.Ct. 79, 99 L.Ed. 673, dismissed by stipulation, 350 U.S. 801, 75 S.Ct. 907, 100 L.Ed. 721. In doing so it stated, Note 2, at page 863 of 212 F. 2d: “The case of Chatz v. Freeman, 7 Cir., 204 F. 2d 764, cited by neither party, is in direct co…