PILLO

v.

NEW JERSEY

Citator

Cited By

• Sterling H. Nickens v. United States, 323 F.2d 808 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
  ….) (dictum), cert. denied, 347 U.S. 946, 74 S.Ct. 644, 98 L.Ed. 1094 (1956); In re Sawyer’s Petition, 229 F. 2d 805, 811-812 (7th Cir.) (dictum) , affirming, 129 F.Supp. 687, 690-693 (D.Wis.1955) (dictum), cert. denied sub nom., Sawyer v. Wisconsin, 348 U.S. 855, 75 S.Ct. 80, 99 L.Ed. 674 (1956); New York v. Fay, 215 F.Supp. 653, 655 (S.D.N.Y.1963) (dictum); Gordon v. Overlade, 143 F.Supp. 577, 578 (D.Ind.l956) (dictum); cf. Suit v. Ellis, 282 F. 2d 145, 148 (5th Cir. 1960) (dictum). The due process stand…
• Bergman v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp. of Am., 251 F.2d 801 (9th Cir. 1957)
  …started to discuss the case of Kwikset Locks, Inc., v. Hillgren, 9 Cir., 1954, 210 F. 2d 483, certiorari denied 1954, 347 U.S. 989, 74 S.Ct. 852, 98 L.Ed. 1123, rehearing denied 1954, 348 U.S. 852, 75 S.Ct. 19, 99 L.Ed. 671, certiorari denied 1954, 348 U.S. 855, 75 S. Ct. 78, 99 L.Ed. 673. The following colloquy ensued: “The Court: There is no law in patent cases. A patent case is a question of fact. “Mr. Kolisch: Pardon ? “The Court: I say, there is no law in a patent case. A patent case is a question…
• Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Walter J. Sawyer. Walter J. Sawyer v. Barczak, 229 F.2d 805 (7th Cir. 1956)
  …was given and accepted. The court there held that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury that Sawyer was guilty as charged in the indictment. The Supreme Court of the United States denied Sawyer’s petition for certiorari, 348 U.S. 855, 75 S.Ct. 80, 99 L.Ed. 674, and his request for a rehearing on that petition. 348 U.S. 890, 75 S.Ct. 205. From the entire record we find the trial court’s attitude toward Krause’s changing stories very reasonable. It was certainly to Krause’s benef…