DRAPER & CO., INC.

v.

COMMODITY CREDIT CORP.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Janich Bros., Inc. v. The Am. Distilling Co., 570 F.2d 848 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1023, 95 S.Ct. 500, 42 L.Ed.2d 298 (1974). “ ‘It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.’ ” Washington v. United States, 214 F. 2d 33, 41 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 862, 75 S.Ct. 86, 99 L.Ed. 679 (1954). . Our holding in Lessig was based on the “not unreasonable assumption that the actor is better able than others to judge the practical possibility of achieving his illegal objective.” Lessig v. Tidewater Oil Co.,…
• United States v. 564.54 Acres OF Land, 441 U.S. 506 (U.S. 1979)
  …ation.” See, e. g., United States v. Certain Property in Borough of Manhattan, 403 F. 2d 800 (CA2 1968); United States v. Board of Education of Mineral County, 253 F. 2d 760 (CA4 1958); Washington v. United States, 214 F. 2d 33 (CA9), cert. denied, 348 U. S. 862 (1954); Fort Worth v. United States, 188 F. 2d 217 (CA5 1951). This Court has not passed on the propriety of substitute-facilities compensation for public eondemnees. Although the Court of Appeals cited Brown v. United States, 263 U. S. 78 (1923),…
• Chisholm Bros. Farm Equip. Co. v. Int'l Harvester Co., 498 F.2d 1137 (9th Cir. 1974)
  …ng in his favor, a district court has a duty to direct a verdict in favor of the opposing party. Brady v. Southern Ry., 320 U.S. 476, 479-480, 64 S.Ct. 232, 88 L.Ed. 239 (1943); Washington v. United States, 214 F. 2d 33, 41 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 862, 75 S.Ct. 86, 99 L.Ed. 679 (1954). When considering the propriety of the grant or denial of a motion for directed verdict, the correct standard 5 is whether or not, viewing the evidence as a whole, there is substantial evidence present that could…