PINO

v.

NICOLLS, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By

• Norwood v. Kirkpatrick, 349 U.S. 29 (U.S. 1955)
  …r transfer was not appealable, the petitioners filed applications for mandamus or prohibition to the district judge in order to require him to set aside his orders of transfer. The Court of Appeals denied the applications, and we granted certiorari. 348 U. S. 870. The cases of the three petitioners present identical questions of law, were consolidated for argument here, and will be disposed of in this opinion. The district judge in granting the motions to transfer stated that if he had been free to constru…
• Maneja v. Waialua Agric. Co., Ltd., 349 U.S. 254 (U.S. 1955)
  …smiss petitioners’ counterclaim but remanded it to the trial court “for proceedings in accordance with this opinion.” We granted certiorari, believing [*259] that the proper administration of the Act requires a resolution of the questions presented. 348 U. S. 870. We are in full agreement with the parties that the first ground relied upon by the Court of Appeals is incorrect. It is not necessary now to consider the vitality of United States v. Butler, supra, for that decision expressly reserved the question…
• Pino v. Landon, 349 U.S. 901 (U.S. 1955)
  …Certiorari, 348 U. S. 870, to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Per Curiam: On the record here we are unable to say that the conviction has attained such finality as to support an order of deportation within the contemplation of § 241 of the Immigr…