BONFIRE RESTAURANT, PETITIONER,
v.
NEWTON RANDUM ET AL., RESPONDENTS
This'cause having heretofore been sub-, mitted to the Court on petition for writ of certiorari upon the transcript of record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, to review the order of the Florida Industrial Commission in said cause, bearing date March 19, 1965, and the petitioner having failed to show that the essential requirements of law have been violated, it is ordered that said petition be and the same is hereby denied.
It is further ordered that the respondent’s petition for allowance of attorneys’ fees be and the same is hereby granted and a fee of $350.00 is hereby allowed.
THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, ERVIN and HOBSON (Ret), JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dion Michael Carawan v. State, 515 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1987)…mm’n, 112 So. 2d 825, 828 (Fla.1959); Lanier v. Bronson, 215 So. 2d 776, 778 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968). The duty of the judiciary is to give effect to this intent, which itself is the overriding precept of statutory construction. In re Estate of Williams, 182 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla.1966); In re Estate of Jeffcott, 186 So. 2d 80, 84 (Fla. 2d DCA [*167] 1966). So important is legislative intent that we previously have characterized it as the “polestar” by which the court must be guided. Wakulla County v. Davis, 395 So.…
-
Small v. SUN OIL Co., 222 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1969)…this knowledge. But if we stop here the taxpayer is left liable for both ad valorem and severance taxes. We apply in this case another principle which has been frequently announced, and is well stated in the case of Estate of Willie Williams, Fla., 182 So. 2d 10 as follows: “In the construction of any statute it is always our duty to give effect to the legislative intent where such is ascertainable.” We therefore hold that, as applied to this case, the basic overriding legislative intent was to impose upo…
-
Allen v. Margarete Dalk, 826 So. 2d 245 (Fla. 2002)…s to sign his or her will, that document will not be admitted to probate. See In re Neil’s Estate, 39 So. 2d 801 (Fla.1949). The signatures of both the testator and witnesses are needed to have a properly executed will. See In re Estate of Williams, 182 So. 2d 10, 13 (Fla.1965). In In re Estate of Olson, 181 So. 2d 642, 643 (Fla.1966), we held that an unattested will [*248] should not be admitted to probate because “[t]he obvious intent of the statute requiring the attestation of a will by at least two witne…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence