SAPERSTEIN

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• Sentinel Commc'ns Co. v. The Honorable D.C. Smith, 493 So. 2d 1048 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986)
  …publicity in all likelihood would be highly detrimental to him.” In some jurisdictions, divorce proceedings are routinely closed from public view by rule or statute. See Stevenson v. Hearst Consol. Publ., 214 F. 2d 902 (2d Cir.1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 874, 75 S.Ct. 110, 99 L.Ed. 688 (1954); C. v. C, 320 A. 2d 717 (Del.Super.1974); Danziger v. Hearst, 304 N.Y. 244, 107 N.E. 2d 62 (N.Y.1952).. However, in Florida dissolution cases are treated no differently than other civil cases, regarding the right o…
• In re O'Neill, 9 Fla. Supp. 153 (Dade Cty. Cir. Ct. 1956)
  …re of the witness, and his immediate delivery to the officers of the requesting state (subsection (3) of section 942.02) was not involved or considered. The third case, In re Saperstein, 30 N. J. Super. 373, 104 A. 2d 842, cert. den. 75 S. Ct. 110, 348 U.S. 874, 99 L. Ed. 688, decided in 1954, primarily dealt with the question whether the “summons” or subpoena provided for by the Act (subsection (2), section 942.02) authorized a subpoena duces tecum, and the provision relied upon in the case before the cou…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Clement Delit v. State, 583 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)
  …, cert. denied,, 467 U.S. 1205, 104 S.Ct. 2388, 81 L.Ed.2d 346 (1984); In re Bick, 82 Misc.2d 1043, 372 N.Y.S.2d 447 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1975); In re Saperstein, 30 N.J.Super. 373, 104 A. 2d 842, cert. denied, 15 N.J. 613, 106 A. 2d 41 (N.J.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 874, 75 S.Ct. 110, 99 L.Ed. 688 (1954). In In Re State of California Grand Jury Investigation, the court parenthetically noted that it would make little sense to allow a state to compel a witness who has material evidence to appear and testify about a…