KUBUS
v.
SWENSON, WARDEN

U.S. | 1954-11-08
No. 143
348 U.S. 877 Supreme Court of the United States (1954) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Renfro, 620 F.2d 569 (6th Cir. 1980)
    …d.2d 112 (1973); Fed.Rules Cr.Proc., rule 23(b). We believe that a defendant may also waive his right to challenge the competency of a juror. United States v. Witt, 215 F. 2d 580, 584-85 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom., Talanker v. United States, 348 U.S. 877, 75 S.Ct. 207, 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954). Nor was it incumbent upon the Court to suggest all of the available alternatives. In a similar case the Ninth Circuit in Delgado v. United States, 403 F. 2d 208, 209 (1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 966, 89 S.Ct. 13…
  • Abe M. Draisner v. Liss Realty Co., Inc., 228 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
    …appeal involves primarily a problem of the proper parties in a garnishment proceeding. Liss Realty Company, Inc., holds a money judgment against Abe M. Draisner. See Draisner v. Liss Realty Co., 94 U.S.App.D.C. 53, 211 F. 2d 808, certiorari denied 348 U.S. 877, 75 S.Ct. 115. It issued attachments and served interrogatories upon Leonard S. Melrod and Everett M. Raffel as garnishees, seeking to reach credits and chattels of Draisner in their hands. Both garnishees answered. Melrod said he held as co-trustee…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw