MARCELLE

v.

ESTATE OF LUPIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48 (U.S. 1955)
  …a v. [*50] Nicolls, 213 F. 2d 20. Because of this conflict among the circuits and the contention that allowing judicial review of deportation orders other than by habeas corpus conflicts with Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229, we granted certiorari, 348 U. S. 882. The Heikkila case, unlike this one, dealt with a deportation order under the Immigration Act of 1917. That Act provided that deportation orders of the Attorney General should be “final” 3 and had long been interpreted as precluding any type of jud…
• Peters v. Hobby, 349 U.S. 331 (U.S. 1955)
  …judge dissenting, by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, relying on its decision in Bailey v. Richardson, 86 U. S. App. D. C. 248, 182 P. 2d 46, sustained here by an equally divided vote, 341 U. S. 918. We granted certiorari, 348 U. S. 882, because the case appeared to present the same constitutional question left unresolved by this Court’s action in Bailey v. Richardson, supra. I. The basic facts are undisputed. Petitioner is a professor of medicine, specializing in the study of me…
• LEE v. Jenkins Bros., 268 F.2d 357 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …Ind.App. 270, 85 N.E. 719. Contra: Edwards v. Keller, Tex.Civ. App.1939, 133 S.W. 2d 823; Pedicord v. Elm Grove Mining Co., 1931, 110 W.Va. 116, 157 S.E. 89. . Maple Island Farm, Inc. v. Bitterling, 8 Cir., 1954, 209 F. 2d 867, certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 882, 75 S.Ct 123, 99 L. Ed. 722; Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Baltimore City v. Murray, 1951, 198 Md. 526, 84 A. 2d 870; Horvath v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co., 1942, 58 Wyo. 211, 131 P. 2d 315; Heaman v. E. N. Rowell Co., 1933, 261 N.Y. 229, 185…

  ← 1 / 2 →