PURE FOODS, INC.

v.

MINUTE MAID CORP.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Gene Harris Travel Serv., Inc. v. Harris Travel Serv., Inc., 486 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …rted by competent substantial evidence. See Pure Foods, Inc. v. Minute Maid Corp., 214 F. 2d 792 (5th Cir.) (defendant’s use of words “Minute Made” caused confusion and mistake on part of purchaser as to origin of defendant’s product), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888, 75 S.Ct. 208, 99 L.Ed. 697 (1954). See also Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Standard Oil Co., 135 So. 2d 26 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961) (competitor’s use of a similar mark may be abrogated if it is likely, when applied to the goods in [*20] question, to c…
• The Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …ergarments. Fancee Free Manufacturing Co. v. Fancy Free Fashions, Inc., 148 F.Supp. 825 (S.D.N.Y.1957). ‘Minute Maid’ frozen meats enjoined by ‘Minute Maid’ frozen juice. Pure Foods, Inc. .v. Minute Made Corp., 214 F. 2d 792 (5 Cir. 1954), cer. den. 348 U.S. 888, 75 S.Ct. 208, 99 L.Ed. 697. ‘Amos ’N Andy’ work shirts successfully opposed by radio entertainers. Feldman v. Amos and Andy, 68 F. 2d 746 (C.C.P.A.1934). ‘Safeway’ eye glasses successfully opposed by chain food markets. Safeway Stores, Incorporated…
• United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …of the offending conduct’ ..., which is all the constitution requires____”) (citations omitted); Anderson v. United States, 215 F. 2d 84, 90 (6th Cir.) (It is “perfectly apparent that no unconstitutional vagueness inheres” in § 1503), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888, 75 S.Ct. 208, 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954). Suffice it to say that we echo these sentiments. On the record before us, there is no doubt that appellant in fact knew — or was chargeable with knowledge — that his conduct fell within the statute’s proscription…