JACKSON

v.

ALABAMA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …of the offending conduct’ ..., which is all the constitution requires____”) (citations omitted); Anderson v. United States, 215 F. 2d 84, 90 (6th Cir.) (It is “perfectly apparent that no unconstitutional vagueness inheres” in § 1503), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888, 75 S.Ct. 208, 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954). Suffice it to say that we echo these sentiments. On the record before us, there is no doubt that appellant in fact knew — or was chargeable with knowledge — that his conduct fell within the statute’s proscription…
• United States v. Griffin, 589 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …he variety of corrupt methods by which the proper administration of justice may be impeded or [*207] thwarted, a variety limited only by the imagination of the criminally inclined.” Anderson v. United States, 6 Cir. 1954, 215 F. 2d 84, cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888, 75 S.Ct. 208, 99 L.Ed. 698. Because of the breadth of the omnibus clause, however, it may not have been actually apparent to Griffin that his conduct would violate § 1503. Indeed, judicial opinions differ on whether false testimony is the type of…
• United States v. De Stefano, 476 F.2d 324 (7th Cir. 1973)
  …Y.1970). It also sets out “facts that show knowledge or notice,” United States v. Pettibone, 148 U.S. at 206, 13 S.Ct. at 546, that Crimaldi was a witness in a pending proceeding. Anderson v. United States, 215 F. 2d 84, 89 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 888, 75 S.Ct. 208, 99 L.Ed. 698 (1954). It is also doubtful whether the common law devotion to legal formalities which fathered the Pettibone decision should govern us today. The Supreme Court has clearly stated that the “old common law rules of crimin…