HALL
v.
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA, EXECUTOR

U.S. | 1954-12-06
No. 395
348 U.S. 896 Supreme Court of the United States (1954) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Harris v. Pa. R.R. Co., 361 U.S. 15 (U.S. 1959)
    …er R. Co. v. Prine, 348 U. S. 826. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. Bonnier,-348 U. S. 830. Chicago North Western R. Co. v. Margevich, 348 U. S. 861. Louisiana & Arkansas R. Co. v. Johnson, 348 U. S. 875. Chattanooga Station Co. v. Massey, 348 U. S. 896. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. Kifer, 348 U. S. 917. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern R. Co. v. Crowley et al:," 348 U. S. 927. ' Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. Wright, 349 U. S. 905. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Chancey, 349 U. S.…
  • Rubenstein v. United States, 227 F.2d 638 (10th Cir. 1955)
    …nment and payment of a fine on each count. On appeal, the judgment was affirmed in respect to the charge contained in the first count but reversed in respect to that contained in the second count, 10 Cir., 214 F. 2d 667; and certi-orari was denied, 348 U.S. 896, 75 S.Ct. 215. After remand, the "trial court reduced the period of imprisonment under the first count, on condition that the fine be paid. The fine was paid; the sentence of imprisonment under the first count, went into effect; and appellant was i…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw