CHAPMAN, DOING BUSINESS AS CARL CHAPMAN FRUIT CO.,

v.

MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Citator

Cited By

• Wirtz v. Osceola Farms Co., 372 F.2d 584 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …wers, exactly the distinction here contended for by the Secretary. Transportation of fruit from farms of independent growers by employees of a fruit company was held not harvesting in Chapman v. Durkin, 214 F. 2d 360 (5th Cir., 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 897, 75 S.Ct. 218, 99 L.Ed. 704 and Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin, 214 F. 2d 363 [*589] (5th Cir., 1954),3 cert. denied, 348 U.S. 897, 75 S.Ct. 218, 99 L.Ed. 705. The perishable nature of the cane is emphasized by appellee as indicating that hauling i…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Blick v. Commissioner OF Internal Revenue, 271 F.2d 928 (3d Cir. 1959)
  …d the purchaser in acquiring the others. Insofar as authorities are helpful in the situation, 1941, H. G. Butler, 43 B.T.A. 1005 and Barber v. United States, D.C.D.Minn.1953, 115 F.Supp. 349, affirmed 8 Cir., 215 F. 2d 663, certiorari denied, 1954, 348 U.S. 897, 75 S.Ct. 218, 99 L.Ed. 704, may be referred to. But the main point is that the transaction was interpreted as a unitary one and we think that interpretation is sound. The judgment of the Tax Court will be affirmed. . Louis D. Blick and Anne Blick…
• Mitchell v. Anderson, 235 F.2d 638 (9th Cir. 1955)
  …amous Realty Co., 2 Cir., 211 F. 2d 198, certiorari denied sub nom. Famous Realty Co. v. Mitchell, 348 U.S. 823, 75 S.Ct. 38, 99 L.Ed. 649; Chapman Fruit Co. v. Durkin, 5 Cir., 214 F. 2d 630, certiorari denied sub nom. Chapman Fruit Co. v. Mitchell, 348 U.S. 897, 75 S.Ct. 218, 99 L.Ed. 704; Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin, 5 Cir., 214 F. 2d 363, certiorari denied sub nom. Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Mitchell, 348 U.S. 897, 75 S.Ct. 218, 99 L.Ed. 705; Mitchell v. Brown Engineering, 8 Cir., 224 F. 2d 359, certiora…

  ← 1 / 2 →