GERALD J. HERZOG, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
918-928 LINCOLN ROAD, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, AND DIXIE BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed a trial court's judgment based on a jury verdict, finding no reversible error in the admission of evidence or the jury charge.
No, the trial court did not err in admitting the lease into evidence, and the jury instructions were proper, thus there was no reversible error.
“Any fact relevant to prove a fact in issue is admissible unless its admissibility is precluded by some specific rule of exclusion.”
Establishes the general rule for evidence admissibility.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe plaintiff, Gerald J. Herzog, Inc., appealed an adverse jury verdict and judgment. The appeal focused on the trial court's admission of a lease int…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Relevant Evidence cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal by the plaintiff in •the trial court from an adverse judgment based on a jury verdict. Motion for new trial was made and denied. The points involved raise questions concerning the admissibility of evidence admitted by the trial court and the propriety of the court’s ■ charge to the jury.
The point directed to the admissibility of a lease, which was admitted into evidence over plaintiff’s objection, must be decided adversely to the appellant. Any fact relevant to prove a fact in issue is admissible unless its admissibility is precluded by some specific rule of exclusion. Johnson v. State, Fla.1961, 130 So.2d 599.
We have reviewed the charge in its entirety and hold that appellant’s objections do not show reversible error. See Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Lawler, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 852.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gerald J. Herzog, Inc. v. 918-928 Lincoln Rd., Inc., 188 So. 2d 822 (Fla. 1966)…Certiorari denied without opinion. 182 So. 2d 53.…
Authorities Cited
- Johnson v. State, 130 So. 2d 599 (Fla. 1961)
- Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co. v. Lawler, 151 So. 2d 852 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)