TOCCO
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1955-01-31
No. 439
348 U.S. 922 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon.

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Solicitor General Sobeloff and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Scales, 594 F.2d 558 (6th Cir. 1979)
    …United States v. Abbas, 504 F. 2d 123 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 988, 95 S.Ct. 1990, 44 L.Ed.2d 477 (1975); Elder v. United States, 213 F. 2d 876 (5th Cir. 1954), cert. denied, 348 U.S. 901, 75 S.Ct. 223, 99 L.Ed. 707, rehearing denied 348 U.S. 922, 75 S.Ct. 300, 99 L.Ed. 723 (1955). Trial courts may take care that such unfair summaries are not presented to juries. Despite the danger, however, most summaries are routinely admitted. See cases, supra. In fact, not only are the summaries themsel…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw