DERECKTOR

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Sheetmetal Workers' Int'l Ass'n v. Fla. Heat & Power, Inc., 230 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 1970)
  …ces, and as such are subject to the jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board; as such, they are an exception to the doctrine of exclusive jurisdiction in the N.L.R.B. Perez v. Trifilette et al., 74 So. 2d 100 (Fla.1954), certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 926, 75 S.Ct. 337, 99 L.Ed. 726; Garner v. Teamsters Union, supra. The authority of Florida courts also is recognized to uphold this state’s policy and enforce its provisions regarding the open shop, under the “Right to Work” provisions of the state Co…
• Williams v. United States, 350 U.S. 857 (U.S. 1955)
  …Certiorari, 348 U. S. 926, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Argued October 13,1955. Decided October 17, 1955. Per Curiam: This case is controlled by the California doctrine of respondeat superior. The judgment is vacated and the case is remande…
• S. Puerto RICO Sugar Co. Trading Corp. v. The United States, 334 F.2d 622 (Ct. Cl. 1964)
  …yne des Ateliers Brillie Freres v. United States, Ct.Cl., No. 392-59, decided January 11, 1963; Seery v. United States, [*627] 127 F.Supp. 601, 130 Ct.Cl. 481 (1955); Derecktor v. United States, 128 F.Supp. 136, 129 Ct.Cl. 103 (1954), cert. granted, 348 U.S. 926, 75 S.Ct. 336, 99 L.Ed. 725, cert. dismissed, 350 U.S. 802, 76 S.Ct. 37, 100 L.Ed. 722 (1955). The second of the Government’s initial defenses concentrates on the fact that plaintiff applied to import the sugar and then paid the disputed fees (thou…