MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
v.
JOYCE AGENCY, INC.

U.S. | 1955-02-28
No. 230
348 U.S. 945 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 99 L. Ed. 740 · 75 S. Ct. 436 · 1955 U.S. LEXIS 1114 · SCDB 1954-059
Cited by 96 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 813, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed. Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling, 316 U. S. 517; Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 317 U. S. 564; Phillips Co. v. Walling, 324 U. S. 490. The judgment of the District Court is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the District Court. The motion of the petitioner to make Goldblatt Bros., Inc., a party in this Court is denied without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to renew said motion in the District Court, or to take such other proceedings for enforcement of the judgment as the petitioner may deem advisable and proper in the circumstances. See Walling v. Reuter, Inc., 321 U. S. 671. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Sylvia S. Ellison and Harold S. Saxe. Stanford Clinton argued the cause for respondent.

With him on the brief was Robert A. Sprecher.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

  • The Boeing Co. v. Shipman, 411 F.2d 365 (5th Cir. 1969)
  • Montalvo v. Tower Life Bldg. & Tower Life Ins. Co., 426 F.2d 1135 (5th Cir. 1970)
    ….I.1956, 144 F.Supp. 528, 532. See also Wirtz v. First State Abstract and Insurance Co., 8 Cir. 1966, 362 F. 2d 83, 87; Durkin v. Joyce Agency, Inc., N.D.Ill.1953, 110 F.Supp. 918, 923, aff’d per curiam sub nom. Mitchell v. Joyce Agency, Inc., 1955, 348 U.S. 945, 75 S.Ct. 436, 99 L.Ed. 740. Moreover, contrary to defendants’ contention, it is immaterial that these employees may have spent only a small portion of their time in performing activities with respect to the Company’s out-of-state policyholders. Th…
  • Chambers Constr. Co. v. Mitchell, 233 F.2d 717 (8th Cir. 1956)
    …n producing goods for commerce and hence under the Act. Meeker Cooperative Light & Power Ass’n v. Phillips, 8 Cir., 1946, 158 F. 2d 698; Durkin v. Joyce Agency, Inc., D.C.,N.D.Ill.E.D.1953, 110 F.Supp. 918, affirmed U. S. Supreme Court 348 U.S. 945, 75 S.Ct. 436, 99 L.Ed. 740; Walling v. McGrady Const. Co., 3 Cir., 1946, 156 F. 2d 932, certiorari denied 329 U.S. 785, 67 S.Ct. 298, 91 L.Ed. 673; Durkin v. Mercer Water Co., D.C.W.D.Pa.1953, 112 F.Supp. 656, affirmed per curiam, Mitchell v. Mercer Water Co., 3…

Previewing 3 of 31 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw