WOLF

v.

BOYD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Citator

Cited By (23 total)

• Dranow v. United States, 307 F.2d 545 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …against Dranow. Goldstein v. United States, 63 F. 2d 609 (8 Cir. 1933); Stoneking v. United States, 232 F. 2d 385 (8 Cir. 1956), cert. den. 352 U.S. 835, 77 S.Ct. 54, 1 L.Ed.2d 54; Schumacher v. United States, 216 F. 2d 780 (8 Cir. 1954), cert. den. 348 U.S. 951, 75 S.Ct. 439, 99 L.Ed. 743; Kansas City Star Company v. United States, 240 F. 2d 643 (8 Cir. 1957), cert. den. 354 U.S. 923, 77 S.Ct. 1381, 1 L.Ed.2d 1438. “After all, jurors are men with minds of their own, and, where they are given to understand…
• Norene R. O'Dell v. United States & Jack Ruhter in Bankr., 326 F.2d 451 (10th Cir. 1964)
  …vely between third parties which does not involve directly or indirectly the bankrupt or his property. Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Riverview State Bank, 10 Cir., 217 F. 2d 455; Central States Corp. v. Luther, 10 Cir., 215 F. 2d 38, cert, denied, 348 U.S. 951, 75 S.Ct. 438, 99 L.Ed. 743; Evarts v. Eloy Gin Corp., supra. However, these rules are subject to certain well recognized exceptions. A court of bankruptcy does have jurisdiction and power to determine a controversy between third parties concerning…
• United States v. DeLILLO, 620 F.2d 939 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …ses testifying on direct or redirect, as happened here. We can see no justification for such a restriction. See United States v. Malizia, 503 F. 2d at 581 (quoting Schumacher v. United States, 216 F. 2d 780, 788 (8th Cir. 1954), [*946] cert. denied, 348 U.S. 951, 75 S.Ct. 439, 99 L.Ed. 743 (1955)). If a credibility issue becomes apparent to the jury, the government should be afforded the opportunity to resolve it through the use of threat testimony — subject, of course, to the usual operation of the balan…