MOORE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Washington, 392 F.2d 37 (6th Cir. 1968)
  …or example, operating a defense plant, then a basis in fact would exist for holding that appellant’s religious beliefs entailed no opposition to noncombatant service. See United States v. Moore, 217 F. 2d 428 (7th Cir. 1954), rev’d on other grounds, 348 U.S. 966, 75 S.Ct. 530, 99 L.Ed. 753 (1955). In the absence of such proof, or any indication that appellant’s beliefs were insincerely held, we find no basis in fact to support the classification in which he was placed. The judgment of the District Court is…
• Turner v. United States, 410 F.2d 837 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …ever granted for registrants of any other class.7 Prior to the adoption of the June 30, 1967, amendment, failure to conduct a Department of Justice hearing required reversal of a conviction for refusal to submit to induction. Bates v. United States, 348 U.S. 966, 75 S.Ct. 529, 99 L.Ed. 753, Per Curiam (1955); Sterrett v. United States, 216 F. 2d 659 (9 Cir. 1954). Appellant contends that the amendment should apply prospectively only and not to a pending case, and also that to apply the change in law and re…
• Bradshaw v. United States, 242 F.2d 180 (10th Cir. 1957)
  …registrant’s classification of 1-0 granted by a local board. Certain it is that a registrant cannot be deprived of a 1-0 classification granted by another board without his file first being referred to the Justice Department. Bates v. United States, 348 U.S. 966, 75 S.Ct. 529, 99 L.Ed. 753. And certain it is that this special hearing procedure is available only to conscientious objectors to service. As stated in United States v. Nugent, 346 U.S. 1, 73 S.Ct. 991, 996, 97 L.Ed. 1417: “* * Congress was under…