BRADLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Elliott Ashton Welsh, II v. United States, 404 F.2d 1078 (9th Cir. 1968)
  …heocratic warfare negated his claim of conscientious objection. This court held this conclusion was wrong as a matter of law and reversed Shepherd’s conviction. In Bradley v. United States, 218 F. 2d 657, 663 (9th Cir. 1954), rev’d on other grounds, 348 U.S. 967, 75 S.Ct. 532, 99 L.Ed. 754 (1955), the hearing officer observed that Bradley believed in using force in self-defense. But the hearing officer did not conclude that this fact negated Bradley’s claim. The court distinguished between a legally insuffi…
• United States v. Hayden, 445 F.2d 1365 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …titled to the support of any inference of sham or insincerity on the part of the registrant which the board could have drawn validly and fairly from the record upon which it acted.” Bradley v. United States, 218 F. 2d 657, 661 (9th Cir.), reversed, 348 U.S. 967, 75 S.Ct. 532, 99 L.Ed. 754 (1954) (citation omitted). See also Bishop v. United States, supra. Nevertheless, Selective Service classifications are subject to judicial review. If a registrant presents a prima facie case for an exemption or a defer…
• United States v. Kaufman, 453 F.2d 306 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …ed to one that was not; the statements at issue were not in the accepted form of affidavits nor did they, on their faces, represent that they had been sworn to. For example, in Bradley v. United States, 218 F. 2d 657, 659, n. 1 (9 Cir. 1954), rev’d, 348 U.S. 967, 75 S.Ct. 532, 99 L.Ed. 754 (1955), the court decided that a written statement not given under oath had less evidentiary value in a Selective Service hearing than an affidavit would have had, and in Williams v. Pierce County Bd. of Com’rs, 267 F. 2d…

Authorities Cited

• Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407 (U.S. 1955)