RYAN STEVEDORING CO., INC.
v.
PAN-ATLANTIC STEAMSHIP CORP.

U.S. | 1955-04-11
No. 157
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
349 U.S. 901 Supreme Court of the United States (1955) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 75 S. Ct. 575 · SCDB 1954-099 · 1955 U.S. LEXIS 945
Cited by 11 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Certiorari, 348 U. S. 813, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Per Curiam:

The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.

Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • …U.S.C.A. § 190 et seq.] and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act.” We have seen substantially such results occur in the now prevalent third party longshoreman death and injury cases: Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic [*20] S.S. Corp., 349 U.S. 901, 75 S.Ct. 575, 99 L.Ed. 1239, 1955 A.M.C. 1422; Weyerhauser S.S. Co. v. Nacirema Operating Co., 355 U.S. 563, 78 S.Ct. 438, 2 L.Ed.2d 491; cf. American Stevedores, Inc., v. Porello, 330 U.S. 446, 67 S.Ct. 847, 91 L.Ed. 1011, 1947 A.M.C. 349; Halcyon Lines v. Haen…
  • Curtis v. CIA., 241 F.2d 30 (3d Cir. 1957)
    …go, but its unfitness, as well, to discharge its cargo. Palazzolo v. Pan-Atlantic S.S. Corp., Pan-Atlantic S.S. Corp. v. Ryan Stevedoring Co., Inc., 2 Cir., 1954, 211 F. 2d 277, affirmed Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S.S. Corp., 349 U.S. 901, 75 S.Ct. 575, 99 L.Ed. 1239; Gindville v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, 3 Cir., 1955, 224 F. 2d 746. Thus the jury, with the acquiescence of the litigants, was left to apply a common understanding of the terms “safe stowage” and “unseaworthiness.” 89 C.J…
  • …F. 2d 277, 279. The decision of the Court of Appeals permitting indemnity was appealed to the Supreme Court and was affirmed by an equally divided Court in a memorandum opinion. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S. S. Corp., 349 U.S. 901, [*758] 75 S.Ct. 575, 99 L.Ed. 1239. The case was reargued before a full Court and the decision of the Court of Appeals affirmed, four members of the Court dissenting. The opinion of the Court dealt with two questions. The first was whether indemnity was barred by the p…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw