NATIONAL UNION OF MARINE COOKS AND STEWARDS ET AL.

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Carter v. Seamans, 411 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1969)
  …resent pursuant to Section 1361, the court is of the opinion that it should decline to exercise its jurisdiction for the aforementioned reasons. Clackamas County, Oregon v. McKay, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 108, 219 F. 2d 479 (1954), vacated on other grounds, 349 U.S. 909, 75 S.Ct. 599, 99 L.Ed. 1244 (1955), and Miguel v. McCarl, 291 U.S. 442, 54 S.Ct. 465, 78 L.Ed. 901 (1934), are urged upon the court by the Plaintiff in support of his contention that mandamus may lie to compel an officer of the United States to pay…
• Beale v. Blount, 461 F.2d 1133 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …ed against an agency has been regarded as an exception to the doctrine that suits may not be maintained against the United States without its consent. Clackamas County, Oregon v. McKay, 1954, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 108, 219 F. 2d 479, vacated as moot 1955, 349 U.S. 909, 75 S.Ct. 599, 99 L.Ed. 1244. In 1962, Congress broadened the availability of the mandamus remedy by investing the district courts generally with jurisdiction to issue the writ which eliminated the previous requirement that reinstatement suits be ma…
• Nat'l Treas. Emps. Union v. Nixon, 492 F.2d 587 (D.C. Cir. 1974)
  …nce to a clear mandate of the Congress. They cannot by bootstraps manufactured by them lift themselves. out of the jurisdiction of the courts. Clackamas County, Or. v. McKay, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 108, 219 F. 2d 479, 495 (Prettyman, J.), vacated as moot, 349 U.S. 909, 75 S.Ct. 599, 99 L.Ed. 1244 (1955). Some opinions state that the courts have authority to intervene when the duty of the executive officer is ministerial, in which event mandamus will lie. * * * But the word “ministerial” is not sufficiently expre…