BRIGGS ET AL.

v.

ELLIOTT ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Steiner v. Mitchell, 350 U.S. 247 (U.S. 1956)
  …etation of the portal-to-portal provisions in the administration of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and because of a conflict between the circuits on the subject, Mitchell v. [*249] King Packing Co., 216 F. 2d 618, we granted certiorari in both cases, 349 U. S. 914. There is no question of back pay involved here because the Court limited its judgment to prospective relief. Nor is the question of changing clothes and showering under normal conditions involved because the Government concedes that these activiti…
• Mitchell v. King Packing Co., 350 U.S. 260 (U.S. 1956)
  …o as to exclude [from the exemptions from the Act] all activity 'indispensable to the performance of productive work.’ To do so would deny effect to the intended meaning of the Portal-to-Portal Act.” 2 We granted certiorari to resolve this conflict. 349 U. S. 914. In Steiner, for reasons therein set forth, we concluded that after the enforcement date of the Portal-to-Portal Act activities performed either before or after the regular work shift, on or off the production line, are compensable under the portal…
• Smith v. United States, 236 F.2d 260 (8th Cir. 1956)
  …abuse of discretion is shown where the trial court, under such circumstances, denies the motion for mistrial. Affirmed. . 118 F. 2d 683, a case from this circuit and relied upon by the appellant as support for his contention. . Certiorari granted 349 U.S. 914, 75 S.Ct. 906, 76 S.Ct. 191.…